Saturday, November 10, 2012


Robots Do Things Better:An Exploration of Autonomous Vehicle Technology


Introduction
Imagine a world without traffic jams, terrifying vehicular death statistics, and even the stress of sharing the road with impaired (or simply unskilled) humans operating two-ton machines at high speeds. Mothers Against Drunk Drivers can be disbanded, global resources like fossil fuel and aluminum can be conserved, CO2 emissions will drop rapidly, and the world will be a safer place. Welcome to the future: the autonomous vehicle is here.     
            An autonomous vehicle, also referred to as a driverless or self-driving car, is operationally defined as a vehicle that meets the same objectives of travel, transport, and sport as a traditional human-operated vehicle, except without human intervention. This autonomous operation is achieved by assimilating technologies such as radar, lidar, gps, and saccadic computer imaging into a system that allows the vehicle to interpret relevant information from its environment, avoid obstacles, adapt to changing conditions, and maintain constant communication with all of the other vehicles in its vicinity (Markoff). The question at hand is, how does this impact the global society?
Background
Autonomous vehicles completely redefine the parameters of efficiency, productivity, speed, and safety. Computer processors do not get tired or distracted; they have faster reaction times and the capacity for a much larger perceptual awareness than do human drivers. Engineers claim that the ability to decrease the following distance could double the capacity of our existing road systems; because of the reduced probability of crashes, cars would likely be much lighter and therefore more fuel efficient (Markoff).
Potential Benefits
From the perspective of both government and individual consumer, it is far more logical to maximize the use of precious resources by integrating an automated public taxi system where the vehicles are in almost constant use. Congestion in urban areas such as the District of Columbia or New York City may be completely eliminated, while cutting costs to the individual driver almost completely.
For the individual, a private vehicle may be a source of pride, but it is still a huge financial burden. As an example, consider the cost of acquiring a license to operate a motor vehicle, the initial investment in the purchase of a private vehicle, mandatory insurance, fuel, parking, maintaining the physical components, registration, inspection, collision repair, and customization. Even still, private cars remain parked 90% of the time (Neil). In addition to the financial investment in commuting via private vehicle is the time spent locked in commute, often due to gridlocked traffic in urban or suburban areas. The average person spends approximately 48 hours a year in traffic, which translates to about 500 billion dollars in wasted fuel (Gruber).
Expert software system architects at the University of Texas, Austin, are already preparing for the dawn of the unmanned vehicle by developing new traffic pattern software that eliminates the need for stop lights and signage on roadways. Integrating technology that already exists, Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC), they have developed a system that allows all vehicles traveling through intersections to safely maintain speed, eliminating unnecessary acceleration, deceleration, and the need to wait for stop signals (Gruber).
Not only is conventional driving expensive, it is also extremely treacherous. In 2004, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported on the staggering impact of traffic on the human population:
of the 50 million traffic-related injuries result in permanent disability. Across all recorded countries, the highest mortality rate is of the youth (WHO). Consider the impact of these road-accident deaths on the global population’s intellectual and economic potential, not to mention the emotional trauma sustained by communities who have lost children.
Currently, it is estimated that at least 95% of all reported accidents are caused by human error (Gruber). However, a study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration approximates that improving vehicle communication systems alone may cut traffic accident rates by 81 percent. By automating all vehicles, theoretically avoiding opportunity for human error, those rates should again drop dramatically. Technology will continue to improve over the first several generations of self-driving vehicles; this trend infers accident occurrence may all but be eliminated in the near future.
In March 2012, Nevada was the first of the United States to enact a law geared toward autonomous vehicle operation, and was quickly followed by Florida and California (Markoff). The recipient of the first unmanned vehicle license was issued to Google, Inc., a company who has pioneered many of the technological advances in the past decade. The founders of Google, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, state that a primary objective for their company is to solve real-world problems using technology.
Sebastian Thrun is the man responsible for Google’s unmanned vehicle project. He is a high-ranking software engineer at Google, co-inventor of GoogleMap’s innovative Street View service, and director of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. In a 2010 Google Blog post concerning the development of self-driving cars, Thrun disclosed, “One of the big problems we’re working on today is car safety and efficiency. Our goal is to help prevent traffic accidents, free up people’s time and reduce carbon emissions by fundamentally changing car use”. If successful, the self-driving car project would absolutely improve quality of life and productivity by the daily commuter population, increase mobility for disabled citizens, remove age and certification restrictions for the occupants of the vehicles, and take large steps toward removing the human contribution to global warming.
Legal and Ethical Concerns
The dawning of the unmanned car does bring several important questions: if an accident does occur, where does the responsibility fall? There is also the question of world-wide approval of driverless vehicles: will the statistical standard for ‘safe’ performance be developed in comparison to human operation, or will this technology require entirely new criteria?
Bryant Walker Smith, a member of Stanford University’s Cyber Law program, began to analyze what data would need to be collected if Google, Inc. wanted to be statistically sure that the autonomous vehicle crash rate is less than the human crash rate. He stated that the vehicles would need to travel, without human intervention, “more than 725,000 representative miles without incident for us to say with 99 percent confidence that they crash less frequently than conventional cars. If we look only at fatal crashes, this minimum skyrockets to 300 million miles.”  Regardless of how infallible a technology appears, the undeniable fact is that all systems have been developed by humans- logic infers that some human error is unavoidable. Almost every system produced has, at some point, failed.  
Security
Another component that remains unclear is the susceptibility of the on-board system to hackers, whether the individual compromising the system desires modification to their personal technological capacity (similar to ‘jail-breaking’ a smartphone), or much worse, the modification is motivated by moral, monetary, or political reasons. Currently, little data exists on the potential security risks.
Conclusion
The autonomous vehicle technology has not existed long enough to fully understand the weaknesses of the on-board software, the communication hardware, or even adaptability to sudden changes in terrain, weather, or dangerous environments. Like most new technologies, it will take time to collect enough data to truly assess the vulnerabilities implicit in the system. If the technology is released before it is refined, there is risk of a rapid series of failures and huge public mistrust. However, if companies like Google, Inc. take the time to rigorously test their product before releasing it for public consumption, the self-driving car may realize a safer, more sustainable world. It gives the high-risk youth the chance to change the face of the future, and for our strong working forces to support the previous generations and contribute to the global economy.


REFERENCES

Gruber, B., (n.d.) Autonomous intersection management. University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~aim/. Accessed (2012, October 7).
Markoff, J., (2010, October 9), Smarter Than You Think. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/science/10google.html?_r=0. Accessed (2012, October 8).
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2010 October). Frequency of Target Crashes for IntelliDrive Safety Systems. U.S. Department of Transportation. DOT HS 811 381
Neil, Dan. (2012, September 24), Who's Behind the Wheel? Nobody. Wall Street Journal Online. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443524904577651552635911824.html. Accessed (2012, October 7).
Smith, B. W., (2012, March 11), Driving at Perfection. Stanford University Cyber-Law. Retrieved from http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/comment/28006#comment-28006 . Accessed (2012, October 7).
Thrun, S., (2010, October 9) What we’re driving at. Google Official Blog. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-were-driving-at.html. Accessed (2012, October 6).
World Health Organization. (2004). World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention: Summary. Geneva.